A Wikipedia page that presents your public career in proportion — what the press wrote, not what your party or office wants

For (former) politicians, elected officials, public office holders and individuals whose civic role has been structurally followed by independent press.

Request a confidential assessment

The reality for public figures

Wikipedia applies a heightened standard for living persons (BLP — Biographies of Living Persons). Every claim must come from a verifiable, reliable source. For politicians: voting records, motions, interview statements and dossiers covered editorially by press. For public figures: civic work, appearances, board roles documented by media.

We work for sitting politicians (national parliament, senate, regional councils), former politicians, public officials, civic leaders and individuals who acquired public status through their role. For each category we apply a different sourcing strategy.

Three reasons

Why our approach fits your situation

BLP discipline

Wikipedia's rules on living persons require extra care: no unsupported claims, no leading framing, no old controversies stripped of context. We work within that discipline.

Politically neutral

We hold no party preference and offer no advice on framing or image. We describe what independent media described — left, right or center.

Discreet toward party and office

The engagement runs through Julius — no party office, no spokesperson, no communications adviser is informed. Just you and your editor.

Frequently asked

What you specifically want to know

I was just elected — can I get a page now?

For members of the national parliament: usually yes, because membership itself confers notability. For locally elected officials: only if there is substantive national or regional press coverage of your work. We assess each situation.

What do you do with negative coverage from the past?

If the source is reliable and the event was substantively covered, it belongs on the page. Wikipedia cannot be edited to remove negative but verified information. We do present it in proportion and context — which is often more balanced than scattered headlines suggest.

Can I remain anonymous as the client?

Toward us: yes, we treat your case confidentially. Toward the Wikipedia community: no. Wikimedia guidelines require transparency from editors working on commercial engagements. That transparency is handled at the editor level, not on your page, and without linking your name to the transaction.

Specific to public figures and politicians

Politically neutral, BLP-careful, discreet.

Request assessment