Wikimedia terms of use contain a clause that most people do not know: anyone who is paid to edit Wikipedia must declare this transparently. That applies to marketing agencies, PR consultants, and independent Wikipedia editors. Here is how that works and why it matters.

The rule

From the Wikimedia terms of use: "You must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation." Disclosure happens on your user page and, where appropriate, on the article's talk page.

Why this rule exists

In fact, Wikipedia's credibility depends on the community's ability to distinguish between independent editorial work and paid communication. Without disclosure, however, the reader cannot judge whether an article is genuinely encyclopedic or subtly promotional. Therefore, the rule protects the encyclopedia's value.

Not sure whether your case qualifies?

Request a confidential assessment — within 24 hours an honest judgment on whether your subject meets Wikipedia's notability standards.

Request a confidential assessment

Want to know if your case qualifies?

Independent editors assess within 24 hours whether your subject meets Wikipedia criteria. Free, confidential, no obligations.

Request a confidential assessment

How we handle this

First of all, our editors declare paid work on their user pages. Moreover, when we write an article for a client, the collaboration is disclosed. This is not optional and not negotiable. Therefore, agencies or editors offering "confidential" Wikipedia work without disclosure are violating Wikimedia policy — and eventually get caught.

What happens if you hide paid work

Meanwhile, the Wikipedia community is effective at detecting hidden commercial engagement. For example, patterns of editing behavior, coordinated language, and editing from particular IP addresses — all of these are visible to volunteer editors who specialize in integrity. As a result, when detected, the article is deleted, the editor account is blocked, and the subject's page is flagged for future scrutiny. Consequently, the reputational damage to the subject is significant.

Does disclosure hurt the page?

No. In fact, a properly disclosed article is judged on its editorial merits — is the notability sufficient, are the sources solid, is the tone encyclopedic. Ultimately, disclosure does not lower the quality bar; instead, it ensures the process is honest.

Prefer to have a specialist do it?

Independent editors at Wikipediapaginamaken write and place your page — no placement guarantee, with an honest qualification up front.

See our approach

The practical implication

So, if you commission a Wikipedia page, ask the editor directly: will you disclose the paid work? However, an editor who says "no, we work anonymously" is either uninformed about Wikimedia policy or is operating outside it. Either way, that is a red flag.

Frequently asked questions

What does Wikipedia require about commercial engagements?
The Wikimedia terms of use require anyone who receives or expects to receive compensation for contributions to disclose their employer, client and affiliation. Disclosure happens on the editor's user page and, where relevant, on the article's talk page. The rule applies to marketing agencies, PR consultants and independent Wikipedia editors equally. It is not optional and not negotiable, and it exists to let the community distinguish independent editorial work from paid communication.
What counts as a conflict of interest?
A conflict of interest under WP:COI covers anyone with a personal, financial or professional relationship to a subject. That includes employees writing about their employer, founders editing their own company page, authors editing their own biography, and editors working commercially on behalf of clients. The rule does not forbid editing in all these cases, but it does require transparency about the commercial relationship so readers can assess potential bias when they see the article.
What happens if a commercial engagement is hidden?
The community is effective at detecting hidden commercial engagement. Patterns in editing behavior, coordinated language and edits from specific IP addresses are visible to volunteer integrity editors. When detected, the article is usually deleted, the editor account is blocked and the subject's page is flagged for future scrutiny. The reputational damage to the subject can be significant and far outweighs the short-term benefit of hiding the commercial relationship.
Does disclosure make the page less credible?
No. A properly disclosed article is judged on editorial merit: is notability sufficient, are sources solid, is the tone encyclopedic. Disclosure does not lower the quality bar, it ensures the process is honest. Editors who claim that anonymous or confidential Wikipedia work delivers better results are either unaware of Wikimedia policy or operating outside it. Either way, hiring such an editor exposes the subject to later exposure and cleanup.